Search for: "Maine v. Strange"
Results 41 - 60
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2021, 7:34 pm
Thanks to the Trump White House and Mitch McConnell’s Senate, there is now a 6-to-3 conservative majority on the Supreme Court, vetted by conservative legal activists and committed to principles of constitutional interpretation that seem to require sweeping Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am
By this I mean, selecting one main information platform. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 8:49 pm
In United Steelworkers Local 2251 v Algoma Steel Inc., in an arbitration of a dual Canadian-American citizen working in Canada, but living on the American border. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 7:56 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court decided to hear NCAA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 11:27 pm
“The Sisvel v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm
—3/29/19 Another Round of Strange Bedfellows on Severability in Texas v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
It might seem strange that congressional apportionment includes noncitizens who cannot vote. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
It might seem strange that congressional apportionment includes noncitizens who cannot vote. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm
Goldstein, during the Google v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
16th-century painting of a civil law notary, by Flemish painter Quentin MassysGlobal consensus appears to be moving steadily toward the embrace of a principle touching on "the ethical considerations which a lawyer should take into account in the field of business and human rights when advising clients. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am
Heinlein, Stranger in a Strange Land Is David Rosner’s and Gerald Markowitz’s ToxicDocs Website Really A Scholarly Enterprise? [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am
This, of course, is precisely why originalists have traditionally rejected living constitutionalism.II.One can see some of the main versions of living constitutionalism as ways of filling out the adaptability claim in ways that do not fall prey to these objections.Some views offer a different rationale for the adaptability claim altogether. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
Over the course of the last few months, lawyers have been deluged with articles about COVID-19 and force majeure, much of them containing quite similar content and analysis. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
The main thrust of the provision asked whether senior commanders (the commanders of organizations like combat divisions and corps, combatant commands, fleets, special operations forces, and entire installations) should be able to decide, like a district attorney, whether alleged violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) that constitute “felonies” (those offenses carrying maximum punishment of greater than a year in prison) shall be “referred” to… [read post]
7 May 2020, 10:58 am
Rather, I attempt to shed light on a few important points that—so far—have not received enough attention, in particular against the background of the 2007 International Court of Justice (ICJ) decision in Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
In this regard, it is the article 23 ‘restrictions’ clause which is the most central, although strangely this is not acknowledged or even mentioned in GC et al itself. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:36 am
The case is MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court began building out sexual harassment law from a Title VII case in 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
