Search for: "Mark Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 42,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am by war
Does the enactment of s 123 mean that principle is no longer applicable? [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
But that does not explain why he is today more than happy to yet again use the exact same system. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 11:00 pm
If somebody explicitly told the EUIPO on application that it does not intend to use the mark, there is not a lot that the EUIPO can do about it. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am by Jan Jacobi
At the same time, proving that a mark has not been used is arguably more difficult; how do you provide evidence of something that does not exist? [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:36 pm by Holly Brezee
Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 9:04 am
Although the week of Thanksgiving marks a happy time for most people, marking as it does the start of the Holiday Season which will stretch through Ashura, Hanukkah, Christmas, and the New Year - for a lot of families throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth area, it will mean tragedy of some kind. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
How much does it cost to get Mark Shurtleff, Utah’s Attorney General, to lie for you? [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:30 am
This does not look to be available if there is no deal. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
And of course, labeling your design as "Patent Pending" does not give you any patent rights. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:06 am by Marcel Pemsel
The Court found that the trade mark does not make sense for such goods because the description explains that protection is sought for the sole of shoes. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:40 pm by Shireen Smith
In pushing trade mark registration as it undoubtedly does, the IPO is not helping start ups. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:55 pm
This list reflects the EEA geographical area.The government does not anticipate any immediate immediate implications for UK, EU or third country businesses. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:50 am by Chijioke Okorie
However, unlike the appellant, the first respondent does not offer classroom-based tuition nor locally accredited qualifications. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
Section 2(a) does not implicate the First Amendment because cancellation of a registration does not burden, restrict, or prohibit PFI's ability to use its marks. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:13 pm by Larry
That does not strike me as a big deal or hard to implement by the importer. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:35 am by Dennis Crouch
  Disclaiming a patent claim does not later erase the fact that the claim was previously in effect and had not been properly marked. [read post]
17 May 2019, 10:34 am
if so, does that bad faith infect the whole mark rendering it invalid? [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:44 am by Matt Osenga
A question that I have after this case is:  if using weasel language such as that a product “may be covered” by a huge list of patent numbers does not constitute false marking if the product is not in fact covered by some or all of the listed patents, how does such a listing comply with the marking statute’s notice requirement? [read post]