Search for: "Matter of Robert T" Results 41 - 60 of 10,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2012, 8:14 pm by Glenn Reynolds
RANDY BARNETT: Roberts decision didn’t open floodgates for ‘compulsion through taxation.’ “Memo to Mitt Romney: Obamacare is a tax because the Supreme Court rewrote the law to make it one. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:14 pm by Glenn Reynolds
RANDY BARNETT: Roberts decision didn’t open floodgates for ‘compulsion through taxation.’ “Memo to Mitt Romney: Obamacare is a tax because the Supreme Court rewrote the law to make it one. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
The core critique of judicial activism is that unelected judges lack a democratic pedigree and thus shouldn't impose their values as against elected officials. [read post]
8 May 2016, 8:54 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
From the Gainesville Sun:Yet Roberts, who holds a doctorate in educational research and evaluation from the University of Miami, told The Sun that he didn't “know there were academic norms. [read post]
Unless Skolfield investigated the matter and determined that Card really didn’t make the threat, he could not possibly know that Card did not commit terrorizing. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:29 pm by Charley Moore
As much as the Court made a constitutional interpretation of Congressional authority to enforce the individual mandate, it also laid down an emerging “Roberts Rule”: elections matter. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 11:13 am by Tom Smith
“So it was up to John Roberts whether he wanted to preside with a president who is no longer sitting, Trump, and he doesn’t want to do it. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:50 pm by Tom Smith
This also means Texas can opt out of Obamacare and if that happens, doesn't it just fall apart as a budgetary matter? [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
  I mean, I wasn’t saying anything BAD about Robert Monks - I am a huge, huge fan of his. . . . [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 4:41 am by Eric Segall
To the extent both opinions rely on substantive due process or unenumerated rights, I don't concur. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 1:46 pm
If you haven't read it, take a look at the Atlantic Monthly interview with Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
  The idea of appointing a woman, then, didn't matter all that much. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 12:01 am
  This week it was Robert Higgs, who is really very good. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:30 pm
Roberts is taking his time, and Chistopher Hitchens isn't getting the better of it. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 The truth is that he didn't, the brief didn't, and, unlike the merits of affirmative action, there are not two sides to that debate. [read post]
Robert Novick, co-managing partner at WilmerHale, informed Lawfare that Mueller “had nothing to do with these representations” and was not party to confidential information on the relevant matters. [read post]