Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 41 - 60
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 12:00 am
McDonnell, vice chair of WUSTL’s Board of Trustees and retired chairman of the board of McDonnell Douglas Corp. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:58 am
”When English-only policies and federal labor law collideBREAKING: McDonnell Douglas lives! [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
” In Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 6:27 pm
” In it, I outline the basics of proving discrimination through disparate treatment evidence, discussing McDonnell-Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:47 am
This is known as the “McDonnell Douglas framework,” after the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:28 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., decided last week, the 6th Circuit finally weighed in on this issue: The McDonnell Douglas / Burdine burden-shifting framework does not apply to the summary judgment analysis of Title VII mixed-motive claims. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 8:43 am
Most courts use the burden-shifting framework established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 3:11 pm
To fill that gap, California courts borrowed the familiar federal burden-shifting framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, or… [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:07 pm
Green (1973) 411 U.S. 792 (“McDonnell Douglas”). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:34 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm
Though lacking direct evidence, the Complainant successfully set forth a prima facie case of gender-based discrimination under the three-stage burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
As an undergraduate, he served in the Air Force Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) while earning bachelor's degrees in physics and mechanical engineering. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:33 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:18 am
Even after 1991, "it became unclear whether mixed-motive cases should be analyzed under McDonnell Douglas. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
” Does this mean that we can forget about shifting burdens of proof, as in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:33 pm
” See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
