Search for: "People v. Becker" Results 41 - 60 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834 is perhaps the most well-known family law example of the tragic consequences of ignoring a survivor’s experience.[1] Less well-known, are the cases developing the law governing domestic contracts. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:49 pm
***Returning to trademark law itself, recall the confrontation over trademarks between "real train" people and "model train" people, leading to a dropping of demands for trademark royalties by the "real train" people: Union Pacific's move in dropping the royalties for model trains is the right one, said Becker. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Starodubtsev, Russian University of Friendship of Peoples, MoscowAlexander Vylegzhanin, Moscow State Institute of International Relations [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 10:45 am
Our mission statement and value promise assures customers that we will provide a welcoming environment for all people, such as families and children, and pays attention to the individual's experience in the Library (Plan, p. 2). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2023.html Becker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 5:43 am
Something like what we want – a rigorous, disciplined approach to warning adequacy – happened in Becker v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
At a 2014 panel discussion, Ford’s lawyer during that period, Benton Becker, explained another part of the President’s motivation was a 1915 Supreme Court decision, Burdick v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:02 am by Michelle Capezza
By Michelle Capezza (Member of the Firm, Epstein Becker Green) and Howard Gerver (President, ACA Managed Services) As employers prepare the Affordable Care Act information reporting filings for the 2016 year that will be due in 2017 (notably the 1094/1095 B&C), the good faith standard of compliance, and the potential for inaccuracies, is no longer available. [read post]