Search for: "People v. Clark (1993)" Results 41 - 60 of 97
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Clarke, 675 F.3d 732, 734 (7th Cir. 2012) (citing Wikipedia entry, in the context of an Eighth Amendment challenge, for the proposition that an anal fissure “is no fun at all”), United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
As to the in camera application, Laffoy J referred to Clarke J’s judgment in Doe v Revenue Commissioners and held the Court has no jurisdiction to hear these civil proceedings otherwise than in public. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  The police are paid to arrest people. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Note also that publicly urging people to fire someone for his speech, even when the firing would be illegal, is likely constitutionally protected under Brandenburg v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
Stack, 997 F.2d 1356, 1363-68 (11th Cir. 1993) (Clark, J., dissenting) (navigability of river in mid-19th century); Naujalis v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
Christopher Clarke J struck the claim out. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am by Peter Tillers
If time allows, the Program Committee will review papers by other people for possible presentation at the workshop. [read post]