Search for: "People v. Parodi" Results 41 - 60 of 575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
So don’t be dumb like a lot of people are. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am by Robert Hougham
However, as UK law stands there is no current legal duty on editors to inform people such as Mr Mosley prior to publication. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:16 pm by Dave_Fagundes
  They’re parodies (because they mock the original work directly), and while that’s not dispositive of the issue, parodies are a form of use that’s strongly favored as fair following Campbell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Seuss Mashup Deemed Copyright Fair Use by Judge— The decision, involving a novelty book that combines Seussian style rhymes and artwork with Trekkie characters and other elements, distinguished the Federal Circuit’s Oracle v Google decision and analogized to the Second Circuit’s decision involving a Naked Gun 33 1/3 promotional poster that parodied Annie Liebowitz’s famous portrait of a pregnant Demi Moore to find the force was strong with fair use. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am by Beth Hutchens
One defense that ETrade could raise would be parody since it is common practice – and a strongly protected free speech right – to make fun of people. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm by Parker Higgins
Related Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceRelated Cases: JibJab Media v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 7:25 am by Nate Harrison
The Beasties of all people should be sympathetic with the novel use of pre-existing materials. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:23 pm
What's more, his songs are parodies of pop songs, and they are about the cases he teaches in Contracts. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 5:49 pm by Colin O'Keefe
It’s funny what people will put out as satire and art nowadays—though, I don’t have any thing wrong with it. [read post]