Search for: "RR v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2012, 3:38 pm
  Reversing BNSF's conviction on grounds of federal preemption.Those pesky states. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 7:16 am
The last iteration of STATE v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: Top Marginal State Income Tax Rates Table: 2023 State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets Notable 2023 State Individual Income Tax Changes Historical State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2015-2023 Individual income taxes are a major source of state government revenue, accounting for 40 percent of state tax collections. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: How High are Individual Income Tax Rates in Your State? [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am by Eric Goldman
This case also brought to mind the sad saga of DC v RR, a case that I still view as one of the most troubling cases I’ve blogged in my 15 years of blogging. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 9:27 am by chief
This is not on appeal from Carmichael in the Court of Appeal, but on a leapfrogged appeal from the Upper Tribunal in a case called RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (which might be this one, but I am not entirely sure). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Whatever thе rеаѕоn, you аrе now thrеаtеnеd wіth аn Intеrnаl Rеvеnuе Service (IRS) wage gаrnіѕhmеnt or state tax levy. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm by Schachtman
The trial court, alas, erred in stating the relevant statistical concepts. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:43 am by Lyle Denniston
Regal-Beloit (08-1553) and Union Pacific RR v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am by The Health Law Firm
RR Co., 99 U.S. 573, 576.Penal statutes must be construed narrowly and are interpreted against the state. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 4:52 pm
In Santangelo v State of New York , the Court of Appeals held that, under the common law, police officers were considered experts engaged, trained and compensated by the public to deal on its behalf with emergencies and hazards often created by negligence and, therefore, generally cannot recover damages for negligence in the very situations that create the occasion for their services. [read post]