Search for: "Rebelle v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 8:27 am by Richard Primus
United States, which fires a loud shot across the bow of the administrative state, contained something like a fictionalized account of the facts behind Schechter Poultry. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:10 am by Maxwell Kennerly
United States, 193 U.S. 197, 400–401 (1904)(Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Marty Lederman
The argument that although rebels, insurrectionists and those who have given aid or comfort to U.S. enemies are ineligible to hold almost all state and federal offices, they may serve as President or Vice President, because those two offices are not offices “under” the United States;  and  ii. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  First, it’s likely that many or all of the Justices will want to preserve states’ authority to prevent rebels and insurrectionists from holding state offices, as New Mexico did in the Couy Griffin case currently pending before the Court. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:39 am by Jon
Union with the United States  would make some sense. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
It is "like" the issue in "He's a Rebel," because it involves a "confusion of source" issue. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
U.N. backed negotiations between the rebels and the government are also continuing in Doha, and the rebels have released government prisoners in a gesture of good faith. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
U.N. backed negotiations between the rebels and the government are also continuing in Doha, and the rebels have released government prisoners in a gesture of good faith. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Khan v Orbis Business Intelligence Limited 20 September 2018, DC Superior Court  (United States) A case which covered statements made by Christopher Steele, former MI6 officer, in a Fusion GPS dossier regarding three Russian oligarchs and their links to the Trump campaign. [read post]