Search for: "Record v. Reason (1999)" Results 41 - 60 of 1,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm by David Smith
UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v Michael John Francis, Grimsby County Court, 18 June 2009, unreported An interesting case this involving issues of tenancy deposit protection, contractual penalties and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 3:06 pm by David Smith
UK Housing Alliance (North West) Ltd v Michael John Francis, Grimsby County Court, 18 June 2009, unreported An interesting case this involving issues of tenancy deposit protection, contractual penalties and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
The defendant’s request to hold under the state constitution that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a wired CI’s car is rejected, following United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
In the Attorney General’s view, such records were not “official records,” because they “merely reflect[ed] the research and analysis preliminary to official agency action. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
There are a few cases in which but a few aspects of records management are considered; see: R. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
There are a few cases in which but a few aspects of records management are considered; see: R. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
Broom claimed that he did have good cause for not presenting the records in the state courts:   the Supreme Court’s 1994 decision in State ex rel Steckman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
The joke is that this variety of syllogism is nothing other than reasoning by the process of elimination. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
Further, the record demonstrates that the search was reasonably related in scope to the reason for the search, in light of the factors outlined in Vernonia. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
Recently, the Second Circuit issued a significant Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) decision construing the FOIA exemption covering law enforcement records that “would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law,” 5 U.S.C. [read post]