Search for: "Reliable Contracting v. Damage Prevention Authority" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
All devices, electronic or otherwise, must be assumed to be prone to error such that the evidence they provide should not be accepted as reliable, unless there is expert opinion evidence, or other form of authoritative certification of their reliability. 3. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am by Ackerman Law Office
The court concluded that defendant had never establish that the learned treatise was a “reliable authority” as required under Wilson vs Clark. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
By contrast, automobile defects more invariably risk bodily injury and property damage. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm by Florian Mueller
The difference is not just the promise -- that one is key if a SEP case is based on contract law. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The petitioners assert that marijuana’s Schedule I status is the only thing preventing courts from recognizing the defense, citing United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
The petitioners assert that marijuana’s Schedule I status is the only thing preventing courts from recognizing the defense, citing United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:53 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
I have written throughout the year about what has occurred in my home state - Illinois - since the Supreme Court's important decision last Fall in Reliable Fire Equipment v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Robert Chesney
Torture evidence damages irreparably that process; it substitutes force for the rule of law and taints the reputation of any court that admits it. [read post]