Search for: "Roberts v. Colorado State University" Results 41 - 60 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Five Ohio universities will receive “state funding for the creation of a civics center specifically focused on American constitutional history” (Miami Student). [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
In an article in the Harvard Environmental Law Review, Robert W. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
To be sure, the Colorado Supreme Court did rely on Hunter/Seattle in invalidating that state’s constitutional ban on local laws barring sexual orientation discrimination, but in affirming that result in the 1996 case of Romer v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
Sanders earned a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California, Davis School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Colorado, Boulder. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:55 am by Eric Segall
Justices Roberts, Barrett, and Kavanaugh likely feared the political fallout from the opinion (all three worked for President Bush during the Bush v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
By Guest Bloggers Margaret Chon and Christine Haight Farley [Margaret Chon is a Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, and Christine Haight Farley is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law.] [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
But two things are clear: 1) the Court's explicit approval of Bush v. [read post]