Search for: "Sales v. Cook et al" Results 41 - 60 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Tex. 2005) (relative risk less than 3.0 represents only a weak association) Cook v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by GuestPost
Some evidence suggest that the general approach is of employers making up their minds as to what they intend to do before consulting with employees (Roche et al. 2011). [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:36 am by Dave
Cook v The Mortgage Business PLC et al [2012] EWCA Civ 17[note for law students: this is a really important case on land registration in which the principles in Abbey National BS v Cann are considered and applied. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:38 pm by Robin E. Shea
A man ran an internet ad seeking someone "who would agree to be killed, cooked, and eaten. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm by Schachtman
  See Donna Stroup, et al., “Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology: A Proposal for Reporting,” 283 J. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Dallas County, et al., v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:00 pm
" Global-Tech Appliances et al v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Aug. 21, 1998), rev’d, 292 F.3d 1124, 1136-37 (9th Cir. 2002) Swine Flu- GBS Cases Cook v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Obzilla has a cook-out. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 In cases involving the loss of expected profits from the sale of goods, the expected net profits equals the expected revenue from the sale of the goods minus the cost of the goods sold minus all of the seller’s expenses fairly attributable to the sale of the goods. [read post]