Search for: "State v. Huff" Results 41 - 60 of 176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Huff, 767 P.2d 572, 576 (Wash. 1989), but it did not provide a definition for the other proscribed purposes. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In 2013, the Court of Appeals in Wisconsin in Habush v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
These facts are sufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel.* Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Huff, Governor Bullock’s state-paid counsel, memorializing the extension Motl granted to Huff and Governor Bullock. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:30 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
It also determined that the sheriff was not required to allow her a two-year convalescence period following reemployment before terminating her employment (Huff v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:04 am by Joy Waltemath
It also determined that the sheriff was not required to allow her a two-year convalescence period following reemployment before terminating her employment (Huff v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 7:03 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
State, 47 So. 3d 297, 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (citing State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm by Patricia Salkin
Ecotone Farm, LLC v Ward, 2016 WL 335837 (3rd Cir CA 1/28/16)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Due Process, Equal Protection, Immunity, Uncategorized [read post]