Search for: "State v. Kovac"
Results 41 - 60
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
Most notably, Judge Bates wrote that suits against government officials in their official capacity amounted to suits against the United States and thus implicated the federal government’s sovereign immunity from suit. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am
It would be easy to frame this issue in classic policy terms of government regulation v. the marketplace. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:08 am
In Kovacic v Harris, 2017 WL 2719362 (D. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
It will look back to several important recent Supreme Court decisions, in particular Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am
These facts are sufficient to state a claim for promissory estoppel.* Multimedia Patent Trust v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
” At the Yale Law Journal’s online forum, Kathryn Kovacs discusses the Court’s decision in Perez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
Kovacs, 148 F. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
At the Boston University Law Review Annex, Kathryn Kovacs discusses Perez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Sanford V. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:33 pm
Ginsburg United States V. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
Kovacic, 13-933, sending the two-time relist straight to DVD. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:22 pm
Kovacic). [read post]
30 May 2014, 6:31 am
United States, 13-632, Turner v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:21 am
Kovac v. [read post]
