Search for: "State v. MacY" Results 41 - 60 of 165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 10:30 am by HRWatchdog
Advance Commission Payments Many employers in California utilize a commission advance and chargeback program like the one at issue in the case, Macy’s West Stores, Inc., dba Macy’s, and Macy’s, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  When Macy initially filed her complaint with the EEOC, it rejected her claim and stated that anti-transgender discrimination was not covered by Title VII. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:16 am
Summary of Decision issued February 23, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Schmidt v. [read post]