Search for: "State v. Scientific Computers, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 5:55 am by Sean Wajert
Defendant moved to have all these experts excluded, arguing none of them met the reliability factors for scientific testimony set forth in State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 2:07 pm by Mike Mireles
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in AatrixSoftware, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Inventio, 649 F.3d at 1357; Apex Inc. v.Raritan Computer, Inc., 325 F.3d 1364, 1372 (Fed. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
The underlying dispute in the Stoneridge case arises over claims that Scientific Atlanta, Inc., and Motorola, Inc., engaged in efforts to help a giant cable television firm, Charter Communications, inflate its financial statements artificially in order to bolster its stock's price. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
There are no scientific publications describing the design of GPT-4. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:45 am by Rose Hughes
 In Australia, the Federal Court recently confirmed that the test for the patent eligibility of a diagnostic method is whether the method has economic utility  (Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v Sequenom, Inc [2021] FCAFC 101). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
Boston Scientific Corp., 561 F.3d 1319, 1332-35 (Fed. [read post]