Search for: "State v. Servantes"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2022, 9:33 am
Philadelphia workers compensation lawyers say that Pantano v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:35 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
After a long and distinguished career as a popular public servant, first as a councillor, then then as a TD, and finally as a Minister, Pat Carey is now a public affairs consultant. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 5:44 am
See People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:22 pm
Justus et al v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
Last week, as readers of this blog surely know, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:01 am
Here are the facts of State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
The Prosecutor v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 4:40 pm
In Comcare v Banerji, the High Court ruled that the federal government may legitimately restrict the right of public servants to express political views, and that those limitations do not breach the implied freedom of political communication in the Australian Constitution. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:45 am
Petersburg, Florida v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
When viewed in the light most favorable to the state, the court says the evidence is adequate. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 8:02 am
Cruz v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 12:37 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:30 am
A police officer holds a position of great sensitivity and trust and is subject to a higher standard of fitness and character are "ordinary civil servants"Oliver v D'Amico, 2017 NY Slip Op 04596, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentA former New York State Trooper, Jean Oliver, commenced a CPLR Article 78 proceeding seeking to annul Commissioner of State Police's determination finding her guilty of certain disciplinary charges or, in the… [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:53 am
The Court dismissed the contention by relying on Sarla Mudgal v Union of India , and Javed v State of Haryana. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:55 am
SENTENCINGUnited States v. [read post]
