Search for: "State v. Steven N. Jackson" Results 41 - 60 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
(c) Increase in the Number of Recusals It has been argued that judicial fundraising has the undesired potential of contributing to an excessive number of recusals.[105] This is problematic since regular disqualifications impose a cost on both the justice system and the public.[106] This is because such involvement “Will often necessitate the disqualification of a judge in a matter they have been involved with or have familiarly with due to their extrajudicial activities”.[107] Justice… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson[1] Professor Levinson has been using his powerful scholarly voice for years now to call our attention to the increasingly hard to justify mal-distribution of the Senate and the way its democratic deficits are hard-wired into our present constitutional architecture.[2]This structural defect is related to the question of Supreme Court reform. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by New Books Script
JN 30 A875 2007 The European Union and crisis management : policy and legal aspects edited by Steven Blockmans. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
Steven Frank Jackson, No. 10-797 (3/21/2011) “Because the trial court credited a prosecutor’s race-neutral explanations and the state appellate court carefully reviewed the record at some length in upholding those findings, the Ninth Circuit’s reversal of the denial of habeas relief was error when it did not discuss the facts or reasoning of the other courts that had rejected the Batson claim. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:15 am by fjhinojosa
Brie Sherwin’s article Pride and Prejudice and Administrative Zombies: How Economic Woes, Outdated Environmental Regulations, and State Exceptionalism Failed Flint, Michigan is cited in the following article: Marissa Jackson Sow, Whiteness as Contract, 78 Wash. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Consider three cases decided earlier this year.In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
We had a post by Steven BarnettSimon Neville who has worked for both papers, has written an open letter to Mail editor Paul Dacre. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Piritek (UK) v Robert Jackson [2018] EWHC 2030 (QB), Nicklin J imposed a 20 weeks’ sentence suspended for the period of two years against a defendant who, in continually breaching an injunction restraining him from publishing defamatory remarks about the Claimant, was found in contempt of court. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name,… [read post]