Search for: "Trade Lisa"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2024, 9:03 pm
I’d like to thank the members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Erik Gerding, Mellissa Duru, Betsy Murphy, Luna Bloom, Mark Saltzburg, Dennis Hermreck, Ted Yu, Tiffany Posil, Dan Duchovny, Shane Callaghan, Adam Turk, Kasey Levit, Lisa McCann, Lindsay McCord, Craig Olinger, Melissa Rocha, Ryan Milne, Cicely LaMothe, Jessica Kane, Mary Beth Breslin, Pamela Long, Asia Timmons-Pierce, Robert Errett, Sean Harrison, Jennifer Lopez Molina, Deegi Biteng, Michael… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
A pre-ChatGPT paper co-authored by Sharon Sandeen questions whether AI related information like algorithms and training data qualifies for trade secrecy.On patentability of AI, I found this Stanford Law panel from 2019 featuring Lisa Ouellette and Mark Lemley very informative and not outdated. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm
Their intent is clear: to maximize trading profits by publishing negative information to trigger a sell-off in the targeted issuers’ common stock. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 8:47 am
– Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:12 am
., which designs, manufactures, and installs trade show displays, after being notified about one employee’s eye injury and another’s foot injury. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 2:26 pm
Siobhan McDonnell, The COP27 decision and future directions for loss and damage finance: Addressing vulnerability and non-economic loss and damage Lisa Vanhala, Putting the constructive ambiguity of climate change loss and damage into practice: The early work of the UNFCCC WIM ExCom Maria Antonia Tigre & Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh, Beyond the North–South divide: Litigation's role in resolving climate change loss and damage claims Articles Giulia Claudia Leonelli, The… [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 1:16 pm
Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-Del.) and Rep. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kenkel, Cornell Brooks School of Public Policy; Lisa A. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, December 8, 2023 Tags: Beneficial Ownership, Executive Compensation, Insider trading, Proxy voting, SEC SEC reports Enforcement stats for fiscal 2023 —with big contributions from whistleblowers Posted by Cydney S. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Friday, December 8, 2023 Tags: Beneficial Ownership, Executive Compensation, Insider trading, Proxy voting, SEC SEC reports Enforcement stats for fiscal 2023 —with big contributions from whistleblowers Posted by Cydney S. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 4:53 am
” Katherine Rosman and Lisa Lerer report for the New York Times. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
See generally Lisa Zornberg, Beyond the Constitution: Is the New York Get Legislation Good Law? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section 2(c) is consistent with the First Amendment, but will it clarify how to balance trademark and free speech rights? [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Lehrmann is suing Network Ten and Lisa Wilkinson over a programme which aired allegations of sexual assault against Liberal party junior staffer Brittany Higgins. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 4:52 am
Lisa Friedman, Julian E. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
On October 4, 2023, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced that DOJ will offer leniency to companies that self-report misconduct they inherit through corporate transactions. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Respondents William Kivett and Bernard and Lisa Bravo filed a class action (which the district court later certified) against mortgage lender Flagstar for not paying interest on their escrow accounts. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
Bergeson and Lisa R. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:06 am
Bergeson and Lisa R. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:11 pm
Recently, two lawyers wrote an article in a legal trade magazine about excluding epidemiologic evidence in civil litigation.[1] The article was wildly wide of the mark, with several conceptual and practical errors.[2] For starters, the authors discussed Rule 702 as excluding epidemiologic studies and evidence, when the rule addresses the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
