Search for: "Truman v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Eric M. Freedman
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  HLS’s Dehlia Umunna discusses Powell v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
They largely cancel each other.McGinnis, of course, so enthralled by the Court's overturning of President Truman's decision, seems not to be bothered by this explicit rejection of originalism in the most important separation of powers case in the last century (maybe ever).Now, returning to NFIB v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
  In contrast, the United States did not even begin scheduled air mail service until 1918. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:06 am by dferriero
Truman Presidential Library and MuseumLaurie Austin, Audiovisual Archivist, the Harry S. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
In response to these requests for presidential records, Trump declared that “[e]xecutive privilege will be defended, not just on behalf of my Administration and the Patriots who worked beside me, but on behalf of the Office of the President of the United States and the future of our Nation. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 7:29 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:19 am by James Romoser
A lifelong Federalist who opposed the Jeffersonian conception of democracy, Marshall broadly interpreted the powers of Congress and declared the supremacy of federal law over state law. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Schulz
It had launched an unsuccessful rebellion on the island on Oct. 27, 1950, and four days later, tried but failed to assassinate President Harry Truman in D.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am by David Super
  That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]