Search for: "Turner v. Rogers" Results 41 - 60 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:30 am by Amanda Frost
Rogers (addressing the procedural safeguards in the collection of child support) and J.D.B. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
” This is what the Second Circuit correctly held as to the film title “Fred & Ginger,” which deliberately referred to Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, Rogers v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am by Dan Markel
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 10:10 am by Donn Zaretsky
 The artist doesn’t have to articulate a critical defense of the secondary work for a finding of fair use, as previously suggested by the Rogers v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm by hls
How to organize subcategories in right to counsel, and reason for lack of optimism for results of Turner. 11:06- Second, topic is the crisis of legal services, but the crisis is in the legal system. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 9:25 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
When I was invited to give a speech in Florida this month as part of a fiftieth anniversary commemoration of the decision in Gideon v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by James Maxeiner
To the relief of many, last year in Turner v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:00 am by Ezra Rosser
[Note: it is worth reading the * footnote to see who the authors are and their role in Turner v. [read post]