Search for: "US v. Cano" Results 41 - 60 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2010, 2:54 am by gmlevine
In contrast, a geographic location created by the developer and having no official recognition can protect its trademark against a respondent in competition with it, Big Canoe Company, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:04 am
Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861, 864 (10th Cir. 1992) (“Common experience of life ... [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:54 am
The Court of Appeals further explained the rationale for the statute in Bragg v Genesee County Agric. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:40 am
How to Use: Baldrich is an admirable fight on bad facts. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am by Schachtman
Del. 2006) (the “no threshold model . . . flies in the face of the toxicological law of dose-response . . . doesn’t satisfy Daubert, and doesn’t stand up to scientific scrutiny”); Cano v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 6:19 am by Steve Cornforth
This is demonstrated by the tragic case of Wall v British Canoe Union. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by William A. Schreiner, Jr.
  Seattle is home to Robinson Cano’s almost-quarter-billion-dollar deal with the Seattle Mariners – maybe not C-suite, but a great employment arrangement in and of itself. [read post]