Search for: "USA v. Masters" Results 41 - 60 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
    Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 08a0258n.06 USA v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:37 am by James Bickford
”  Blogging for The Atlantic, Stuart Taylor Jr. parses Kagan’s Oxford master’s thesis for clues into her views on Graham v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It’s a system which has generally worked well over the years and is a world away from, say, the absurdity of politically appointed judges in the USA. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
… and then Darren takes the floor for a more in-depth analysis.* Canary Wharf: great place name, not much hope for a trade mark ...Jeremy writes upCanary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision with a history, and a curious trade mark tale too.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the… [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
 Orna Ophir talks about her Psychosis, Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry in Postwar USA: On the Borderland of Madness. [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:38 pm by Claire Poppelwell-Scevak
  Further arguments on this post can be found by reading my Master thesis. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:34 pm
The conference revisited the decision in Bridgeman Art Library v Corel Corporation (New York Southern District Court 1999).In the case under discussion, the Corel Corporation, a Canadian software company, was distributing clip art CDs in the USA. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:54 am
Franklin Covey Co., 316 F.3d 337, 350 (2d Cir., 2003) (citing Black's Law Dictionary 430 (7th ed.1999)); Reis Robotics USA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am by Wolfgang Demino
" Coast to Coast Energy, Inc. v Gasarch,149 AD3d 485, 486 (1st Dept 2017) (citations omitted); see also Cotia (USA) Ltd. v Lynn Steel Corp. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:35 am by Kiran Bhat
Robert Pear reports in the New York Times on the Obama administration’s unexpected support for drug maker Astra Zeneca in Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:08 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The validity of a “no oral variation” clause was recently upheld by Master Prowse of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Becker v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
’” Briefly: In USA Today, Richard Wolf cites two upcoming Supreme Court cases, Husted v. [read post]