Search for: "United States v. Young, Jr." Results 41 - 60 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by Jeff Gamso
United States when he said that the Constitution offered no protection for falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am by Alex Bailin QC, Matrix
He considered (applying PG v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 51) that REP was a significant but not necessarily conclusive factor in deciding whether Article 8 was engaged. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm by Linda McClain
A survey released in 2017, on the 50th anniversary of Loving, found that one in six new marriages in the United States crosses racial or ethnic lines, although the white-black line is crossed less frequently than other lines, such as white-Asian, white-Latinx, or other combinations. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Gustafson’s most high-profile litigation matter is her representation of the plaintiff in Young v. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
Meigs, Lincoln’s General, Master Builder of the Union Army is also reviewed in the newspaper.Nicholas Syrett's American Child Bride: A History of Minors and Marriage in the United States is reviewed at Slate. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
IN THE NEWS The United States sued the state of California and California officials over California’s immigration enforcement policies. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Adam Chandler
Lewis is now likely to be the first woman executed in the United States in five years, and the first in Virginia in nearly one hundred. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:29 am
The argument in Safford United School District v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
Bankruptcy judges are appointed by majority vote of the judges within a United States Court of Appeals Circuit. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
This is how he interprets the case law of the ECtHR at [109]: “It is true that in S v United Kingdom the court does not expressly refer to the reasonable expectation of privacy but its analysis seems to me to be consistent with it. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
That's the rule laid down by two 101-year-old companion cases, Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) and General Oil Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am by David Kopel
Young, Jr., brought a lawsuit in the federal district court for the district of Hawaii. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:16 am by Arthur Bright
The United States Supreme Court is, when it comes to technology, almost completely ignorant. [read post]