Search for: "Vides v. Vides" Results 41 - 60 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” The Special Committee that is being referred to in the order was constituted as per the directions of the Supreme Court in the case of Foundation for Media Professionals v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:38 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Vide letter dt. 30.06.2008, the Director General had specifically stated that Denel was to replace the rejected equipments.5. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 1:33 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The High Court, vide the order impugned before the SC in the aforesaid case, refused to appoint an arbitrator stating that the claims of the petitioner stood barred by limitation. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
 As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
Though the discretionary power vested in the Supreme Court under Article 136 is apparently not subject to any limitation, the Court has itself imposed certain limitations upon its own powers vide Ram Saran Das and Bros. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
  They're warehouses.Yesterday, the unanimous Supreme Court said (Tapia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 1:44 pm
In his comment to my post regarding the "PRS Conference on Effective Legislatures-Part 1", Venkatesan has rightly pointed out that as per the Supreme Court's judgment in Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. [read post]