Search for: "Wright v. State of California" Results 41 - 60 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2016, 1:25 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court precedent set in Lockhard v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm by Amy Howe
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:06 am by Patrick Wright
Patrick Wright is the vice president for legal affairs at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, which filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Janus v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  But the proponents’ claim that the California Supreme Court can and should address this alleged lawlessness by state officials is open to some serious complexity and significant doubt. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 8:01 am by Dan Bressler
Starting with: “Looking at Your Firm’s Balance Sheet: Law Firm Clients, and Lawyers, are Not Property” — “It has been almost two years since the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Heller Ehrman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 1:02 pm by John Wright
It is likely to become a Supreme Court issue if the State of Hawaii decides to appeal. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perry, the case (argued late last month) in which two same-sex couples sued in federal court to invalidate California’s Proposition 8, a voter-adopted state constitutional ban on gay marriage. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:04 pm
The government distinguishes a Ninth Circuit decision, Wright v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 11:22 pm by Ted Frank
[Wright] Eleventh Circuit amicus brief in Cappuccitti v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Target (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) Claim amendments in reexamination eliminate patentee’s right to past damages: District Court C D California – Antonious v. [read post]