Search for: "Young v. The Young Holdings Corp., Ltd."
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
He lives with his wife and two young sons in Metairie, Louisiana. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:16 am
The General Court gave its decision today in a Community trade mark appeal, Case T-369/10 You-Q BV v OHIM. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
* Smith v. eBay Corp., 2012 WL 27718 (N.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Div. 1996) Keene Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
He lives with his wife and two young sons in Metairie, Louisiana. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 6:26 pm
See, e.g., Advantage Consulting Group, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Bay, Ltd., 344 F.3d 474, 478 n. 14 (5th Cir.2003); Paladino v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
(ArsTechnica) Ernst & Young Report: The Benefits of software IPR protection in China (IP Dragon) From phones to tablets. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The Cities of Allen, et al., No. 10-0375 El Apple I, Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Young v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
ANDIn Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
The Court also may be holding Young v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
L.J. 1345, at 1380 and the case of Young v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm
(f/k/a GMAC Commercial Holding Corp.) [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Yeti By Molly Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
Bedding Holdings v INEC & Others (IPKat) Scotland Use it or lose it? [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
Novopharm Ltd. the Federal Circuit explicitly found that such concealment is not a violation of the best mode, and the preference held by an inventor’s company or assignee cannot be imputed to the inventor himself in order to find a best mode violation.[35] Although the court recognized that this holding creates a strong incentive for companies to screen their inventors of [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Corp., 602 F.3d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 2010) (citing Warner Bros. [read post]
