Search for: "Brown v. Wells" Results 581 - 600 of 4,961
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  So the symposium featured artistic performances as well as detached analyses of the idea of performance more generally and what the basis of our evaluations might be. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
There is one vacancy, for which there is a Biden nominee pending (and there will be a second vacancy, when Ketanji Brown Jackson takes her seat on the Supreme Court this summer, and a Biden nominee pending for that seat as well). [read post]
One Commissioner who dissented on policy grounds nevertheless noted that the SEC’s “disclosure regime related to environmental issues including climate change is highly developed and robust, and registrants are well aware of, and have decades of experience complying with, these disclosure requirements. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  That being said, it should be obvious that such a “constitution” could well be considered disastrous. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Note also that similar arguments could apply to financial donations to the campaign, see Brown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The rule change got Justice Amy Coney Barrett through the Senate, but it also got Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson through. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
"] Ilya Shapiro, as many of you know, was suspended and investigated by the Georgetown law school—where he had been about to start a job as a lecturer and as executive director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution—for tweeting the following about the Ketanji Brown Jackson nomination: Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:09 pm by JURIST Staff
  On Friday May 13th, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered its judgment in the case of R v Brown, rejecting the constitutionality of section 33.1 of the Criminal Code, a provision removing “extreme self-induced intoxication akin to automatism” as a defence to otherwise criminal acts requiring voluntariness when those acts involved an element of assault or bodily interference. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Badger, 2021 SKCA 118 [35] The inherent dangers and frailties of eyewitness identification evidence are well known: see, for example, R v Pelletier, 2016 SKCA 62, 480 Sask R 56, and R v Bigsky, 2006 SKCA 145, [2007] 4 WWR 99 [Bigsky]. [read post]