Search for: "Clark v. State Bar" Results 581 - 600 of 686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
A federal judge in California blocked a Biden Administration rule that bars migrants who crossed into the United States from applying for asylum unless they entered the country at an official port of entry or obtained asylum protection in a different country. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm by Zoe Stern
A state judge overturned Georgia’s ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, ruling that it violated Roe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:18 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
The Forum is a nationally recognized provider of legal education seminars and is an approved Legal Education Provider by the California State Bar and other State Bars across the nation. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Last week, we reported on the Bar Standards Board’s disbarring of barrister David Harris, who tweeted as @geeklawyer. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
Sapkota v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Court of Appeal case about segregation of immigration decisions – by the Free Movement Blog. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 2:25 pm by Ilya Somin
After all, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment bars defendants from being twice "put in jeopardy" for "the same offence. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The Canadian Privacy Law Blog has published a presentation given for the Canadian Bar Association’s British Columbia Privacy and Access Law Section and the Immigration Section. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Professor George, however, exceeds all reasonable boundaries even for me (someone who is pro-choice but thinks the issue should be returned to the states). [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
That, too, was a legitimate congressional determination:The [act] bars qualified civil liability actions, as defined in the statute. [read post]