Search for: "DEFENDANT DOE 1-10"
Results 581 - 600
of 12,407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
" Claimant does not allege that defendant's age limitation hiring plan is a subterfuge to evade the purposes of the ADEA; rather, claimant contends that the exception does not apply here, where claimant worked as a part-time officer and attempted to transfer into full-time employment. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:15 pm
This is the latest in a series of fairly short posts introducing Freudian psychoanalysis (see 1. here, 2. here, 3. here, 4. here, 5. here, 6. here, 7. here, 8. here, 9. here, and 10. here). [read post]
22 May 2015, 11:34 am
Najem, Jr. and 10 unknown defendants, all of Indiana, infringed various trademarks belonging to HRHH. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
His blood is below the legal limit, the prosecution does not care. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:00 pm
His blood is below the legal limit, the prosecution does not care. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
”[24] [1] See Juliana v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:25 pm
I think there are several likely reasons causing criminal defendants to forfeit their rights to a jury trial, but today I’m going to discuss two.1. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm
Oral arguments were held January 9, 2012 [See WIMS 1/10/12]. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:48 am
., No. 1:18-cv-08913(ALC) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:00 pm
FHC/L/CS/1418/2019) decided late last year.Background Green Light Music Publishing Ltd, Chocolate City Music Ltd and Premier Music Publishing Company Ltd (the plaintiffs) filed an Originating Summons at the Federal High Court in which it requested the court to determine this sole question: “whether, by virtue of the provisions of Regulations 15(1) and (2) of the Copyright (Collective Management Organisation) Regulations 2007, the Defendant’s manner of distribution,… [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 8:13 am
” §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 require plaintiffs in securities-fraud actions to prove reliance on a material misrepresentation or omission made by a defendant. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:18 am
At that point, Defendant No. 1 gestured to the officer to wait for a moment. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 2:06 pm
CPL § 216.05 (10). [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 5:05 pm
Local 3315 employed in the Office of the Public Defender:1. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:48 am
They suggest that defendants: 1. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
State of Indiana , a 29-page, 2-1 opinion, discusses several significant issues at length, including the State's ability to amend the charging information under IC 35-34-1-5 and whether application of the amended version of the statute to the defendant violates ex post facto laws, as the dissent writes. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Great American Insurance Co., 2010 WL 2723195, at *1-2 (S.D. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:46 pm
XYZ Company Nos. 1-25 et al Texas Western District Court Filed: March 10, 2008 Plaintiff: NetSpend Corporation Defendant: XYZ Company Nos. 1-25, John/Jane Does 1-25 Case Number: 1:2008cv00196 Monterey Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 10:09 am
On September 5, 2003, 10 years after plaintiff’s birth, his counsel sent defendant hospital a notice of claim alleging, in essence, that plaintiff suffered brain injury resulting from the hospital’s malpractice during his delivery. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 10:09 am
On September 5, 2003, 10 years after plaintiff’s birth, his counsel sent defendant hospital a notice of claim alleging, in essence, that plaintiff suffered brain injury resulting from the hospital’s malpractice during his delivery. [read post]
