Search for: "Davis v. Key"
Results 581 - 600
of 973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2008, 6:42 pm
For illustrative purposes, this book considers the key phases of jury trials (opening statements, direct and cross-examination, closing arguments and voir dire) in the light of a particular case: United States of America v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:00 pm
This past November, the Federal Circuit addressed those questions in K-Con, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am
TSA Stores Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
However, Katz v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm
Damages were assessed, following a default judgment, in the sum of £75,000 On 12 March 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Davies v Carter. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Braman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm
Citing Mark Foy's Limited v Davies Coop and Company Limited (1956) 95 CLR 190 - "The public...are being invited to purchase goods of the defendant which are to be distinguished from the goods of other traders partly because they are described as "Tub Happy" goods. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
This might explain some of what the Supreme Court said and did in the 1993 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
V, § 48.2. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:27 am
Davis. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
[Footnote: Davis ex rel. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
Davis, but my third agenda item should be enough to deal with it.) [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
Last Week in the Courts The trial in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics was heard by Nicola Davies J on 16, 17 and 20 July 2018 and is part heard, continuing on 23 July 2018. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:31 pm
In Crawford v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
TM status and scope is also key: One use on a specimen gets you registration. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
In Reno v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 9:07 am
Ultimately, Richards becomes yet another author who abridges and bastardizes Hill’s key insights. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
