Search for: "In re Hoffman"
Results 581 - 600
of 949
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
Merrell challenged Swan’s unpublished, non-peer-reviewed re-analyses as not “generally accepted” under the Frye test. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm
After all, Lauren Giddings was president of the Federalist Society at Mercer, and there’s no evidence that she was anything but a lovely — and perfectly well-adjusted — person.)Commentator Chelsea Hoffman offers this summary of Stephen McDaniel:Stephen McDaniel does seem like a pretty weird guy. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:03 am
The frantic selling and re-selling of mortgages is often listed as one factor in the housing crisis. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:57 pm
Only Hoffman describes the overbreadth doctrine as inapplicable to commercial speech. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:23 pm
Hoffman, a business strategies coach. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
., etc.Title Insurance: CALIFORNIA FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS ARBITRATION IN TITLE INSURANCE DISPUTE, In re Cal. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaJustice Dalveer Bhandari and Justice H.L. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:13 am
In terms of proximity, Eric joins Orin Kerr and Dave Hoffman in noting that the physical proximity that motivates the SOS system is absent in cyberspace. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
Grama (Purdue IT), David Hoffman (Intel), Lance Hoffman (GWU Computer Science), Joanne McNabb (Cal Dept. of Consumer Affairs), Lisa S. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:08 am
Where the Deep End was trying to recreate Grey’s Anatomy or ER in BigLaw (LA no less), Suits is a character-driven show that happens to use BigLaw-ish (technically, it appears to be a boutique, but they’re trying to act like it’s BigLaw nonetheless) as its environment. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:03 am
Part II shows how issue preclusion (in res judicata) was reconceived in the course of the nineteenth century, morphing from a doctrine focused on the relitigation of particular facts, to a doctrine concerned with legal issues, now understood as involving legal conclusions based on facts. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
As Steve Hoffman wrote in the Akron Beacon Journal, “There is still work to do, but so far there has been give-and-take. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
On average, the BAC of an arrested driver is 0.16; very close to the super drunk threshold.So the best thing to do is simply stay off the roads when you've had too much to drink; that way, we're all safer. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 5:57 am
Jody Gangloff Hoffman of Cornell talked about blood meals. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:10 am
On average, the BAC of an arrested driver is 0.16; very close to the super drunk threshold.So the best thing to do is simply stay off the roads when you've had too much to drink; that way, we're all safer. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
If you're going to check out one of the links below, make it Karen Koehler's video of her deposition of a rather uncomfortable (and apparently relatively clueless) insurance adjuster. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
It was the last blank space on the legal map – the only state with no precedent whatsoever. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
Part II shows how issue preclusion (in res judicata) was reconceived in the course of the nineteenth century, morphing from a doctrine focused on the relitigation of particular facts, to a doctrine concerned with legal issues, now understood as involving legal conclusions based on facts. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:00 am
The case is over and we're on to the next thing. [read post]
