Search for: "PER-CO LTD" Results 581 - 600 of 1,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
It would seem that the dominant jurisdiction doctrine cannot furnish an answer - and would not provide a basis for abatement - because the two fora do not have co-extensive authority under an arbitration agreement that makes some claims arbitrable but not others, - at least not in a scenario where both types of claims are present in the same dispute and are contemporaneously pursued, in the respective fora, but involve a common core of case-determinative facts. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
The rule stands as an exception to the general practice governing applications for interim injunctions in civil proceedings established in American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd ([1975] AC 396 (HL)), whereby the court considers whether there is a serious issue to be tried and, if so, where the balance of convenience or justice lies. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
Ltd. v.Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999) and Daubertv. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
A reporting company that fails to file a beneficial ownership report (or a required amendment) when due is subject to a $500-per-day fine up to a maximum of $10,000. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 10:25 am by Robbie Peroni and Gemma Adams
This is referred to as the principle of co-extensiveness. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd (IPKat) Ex-MTV executive a suspect in promo and piracy case (TorrentFreak) UK IP Office - new database of fast-tracked green inventions, designed to help the development of environmentally-friendly technology, launched (IPKat) (IPKat) Reader’s queries: UK's somewhat complex and convoluted unregistered design legislation (Class 99) Nice reference as CIPA plans to entertain (IPKat)   United States US Patent Reform USPTO… [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
G.D.Searle & Co., 814 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1987)(per curiam) Bendectin cases Lynch v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Jason Mueller
  Plaintiffs demanded statutory damages in an amount up to $150,000 per work infringed. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:47 am by Jason Rantanen
By Sarah Burstein, Professor of Law at Suffolk University Law School Jiangsu Huari Webbing Leather Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
G.D.Searle & Co., 814 F.2d 655 (4th Cir. 1987)(per curiam) Bendectin cases Lynch v. [read post]