Search for: "Robert C Harding" Results 581 - 600 of 1,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
  Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority (Justice Sotomayor dissented, and Justices Breyer, Kagan and Ginsburg filed partial dissents) , described the program and how it was applied to the petitioners, who raise and “handle” raisins subject to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, which was enacted during the Depression to maintain stable market for certain agricultural commodities. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:20 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 (Cf. the Colin Firth Darcy, which really has knocked Pride and Prejudice out of its prior cultural orbit.)Where the Alice books "came from" has always been a hard question. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:20 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 (Cf. the Colin Firth Darcy, which really has knocked Pride and Prejudice out of its prior cultural orbit.)Where the Alice books "came from" has always been a hard question. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
German SCt: Hard Rock Café in Heidelberg—not licensed by the Hard Rock Group. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Chief Justice Roberts sounded a similar theme in his dissent in Obergefell. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
A Bellingcat and Byline investigation can for the first time reveal Scotland Yard had intelligence Mazher Mahmood was corrupting police officers as far back as the summer of 2000. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:22 pm by Joseph Fishkin
The difference is the questions.The Court generally takes cases that raise hard questions. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Again this process is not fully explained in the judgment and is hard to understand by reference to existing authorities on damages for non-pecuniary loss. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
 According to story by Robert Pear in the New York Times “the words were a product of shifting politics and a sloppy merging of different versions. [read post]