Search for: "Roy v. Roy"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 11:18 am
(See Prewitt v Walgreens Order). [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 6:48 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:46 pm
Ct. 2009) See also Parker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Supreme Court unanimously held in Allen v. [read post]
Determining “in-service” status for the purposes of qualifying for a disability retirement allowance
12 Jul 2011, 3:48 am
New York State Trooper Roy P. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:59 am
The case is Massey v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:50 am
In a recent California case, Madrid v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:48 am
Roy (1986) and Lyng v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:31 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Roy T. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:45 am
Roy Cannon, LPCMH’S – 2011 WL 6841209 Reply Brief of Appellants – 2011 WL 7102262 11:00 AM Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:04 am
., AND SRINATH CHINNAKOTLA, M.D. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 12:14 pm
Roy Agency, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:07 am
Roy L. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 9:35 am
Roy v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am
I, personally, find Article V particularly interesting. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:37 pm
Kaplan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
On Monday January 24th, 2011, a panel of Ontario Divisional Court Judges began hearing the case of Hanna v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
The case, Noel Canning v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
DECISION & ORDER In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e(5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim or to deem a late notice of claim timely served nunc pro tunc, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roy S. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:03 pm
DECISION & ORDER In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e(5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim or to deem a late notice of claim timely served nunc pro tunc, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roy S. [read post]