Search for: "SHORT v. USA" Results 581 - 600 of 1,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2013, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
July 23, 2013 - 11 AM: In re PRL USA Holdings, Inc., Serial Nos. 85284101 and 85284130 [Section 2(a) deceptiveness refusals of DENIM & SUPPLY RALPH LAUREN for handbags and for belts; blouses; coats; dresses; hats; jackets; pants; scarves; shirts; shorts; skirts; t-shirts; tops [DENIM disclaimed]].July 23, 2013 - 2 PM: Clear Choice Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Will Baude covers United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
In short, the FISA Court, acting under section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act (known to history somewhat misleadingly as the “library records” provision), has required Verizon (and perhaps other carriers covered in different orders) to turn over to the NSA and the FBI data on all telephone calls in its systems, both within the U.S. and between the U.S. and other countries, on an “ongoing, daily basis. [read post]
18 May 2013, 8:00 am by David Kris
Amnesty Int’l USA, 2013 WL 673253 at *4 n.2 (U.S. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
” In short, the fundamental right of free speech relates to the free flow of ideas, opinion and information. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:52 pm by John Bellinger
   This morning the Supreme Court granted cert in DaimlerChrysler AG v Bauman, an ATS suit against Daimler. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
”In short, the fundamental right of free speech relates to the free flow of ideas, opinion and information.Our first group of slide controls concerns the extent of copyright and its interaction with each of these three aspects of freedom of speech.Slider 1: From Expression to IdeasIt is a truism, if not always an illuminating one, that copyright protects expression and not ideas. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 12:11 pm by Larry
That was in a case called Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. [read post]