Search for: "Supervisors v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2016, 10:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed for failure to state a claim. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:50 am by David Urban
  (The Supreme Court in fact rejected a rule of personal liability for retaliation in Jones v. [read post]
The lawsuit, which was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, alleges that the county supervisors, in their capacity as drainage district trustees, are operating their drainage districts in an “unlawful and antisocial” manner that is contrary to the “public health and welfare. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Jean Jeudy, born in Haiti, emigrated to the United States in 1994 and received a bachelor's degree in forensic science in 2003. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:30 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CCH-Workday+%28WK+WorkDay%29 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, rules supervisors of county employee are immune from lawsuit alleging deliberate indifference to a known workplace dangerBy Lorene D. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, her Title VII claim against the Assistant Secretary of State in his official capacity, as well as her Section 1983 and state law claims, were dismissed because of Eleventh Amendment immunity (Canfield v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[McGunigle v City of Quency, USCA, First Circuit, Docket # 15-2224.] [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm by John M. O'Connor
  On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 5:35 am by John M. O'Connor
  On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:27 pm by Jon Katz
 The probationer’s lawyer should examine the extent to which the probation violation report does not state a possible probation violation at all (see White v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 7:49 am by Markus Sermons
The likely reason that the supervising officer let the driver go about his business is that the United States Supreme Court in the case of Delaware v. [read post]