Search for: "U.S. v. Garland*" Results 581 - 600 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
  Likewise, the Jan. 6 committee’s extensive use of visual aids and video clips of witness testimony—which New York Times television critic James Poniewozik described as “more the stuff of a high-gloss streaming documentary than anything we’re used to seeing from the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
PODA includes a subtitle devoted to strengthening congressional control over the president’s ability to declare a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act—an authority used by Trump as a means of funneling resources into the partial construction of a wall along the Mexico-U.S. border. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The U.S. corollary is that even if our political system ultimately rejects Trump, some of the norm-breaking at the heart of the distinctive “Trumpist” style of politics will undoubtedly continue. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:55 pm
Months after the Duluth, Minnesota jury's October verdict, U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am by Matthew Scott Johnson
Arnold Loewy & Charles Moster, It’s debatable: Can the president ignore an order from the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Daily Journal (subscription required), David Boyle looks at National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am by Michael Dreeben
Those arguments provide a counterpoint to calls here to reduce the power of the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:25 pm by Victoria Kwan
Three days later, Sotomayor spoke at the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
For several weeks now, a constitutional conflict has been simmering on Capitol Hill. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:05 am by New Books Script
. : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]