Search for: "WILLIAMS v. MAY et al" Results 581 - 600 of 882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
 Cases with broad national repercussions may garner 100 amicus briefs or more (one example of a case with over 100 such briefs is Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am by Alyson Grine
See, e.g., Ronald Randall et al., Racial Representativeness of Juries: An Analysis of Source List and Administrative Effects on the Jury Pool, 29 Just. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:33 am by Alyson Grine
See, e.g., Ronald Randall et al., Racial Representativeness of Juries: An Analysis of Source List and Administrative Effects on the Jury Pool, 29 Just. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:53 am by Schachtman
Baan, Kurt Straif, et al., “The science and practice of carcinogen identification and evaluation,” 112 Envt’l Health Persp. 1269, 1273 (2004). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am by Mary Whisner
Neuschatz et al., The Effects of Accomplice Witnesses and Jail-house Informants on Jury Decision Making, 32 Law & Hum. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
Martin, et al., New York Evidence Handbook  318 (2d ed. 2002)). [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
FEC Case Dissent from Dismissal Commissioners’ Statement of Reasons (May 6, 2021) Federal Election Commission, Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 8:01 am by Nate Nead
Whereas even online banks may charge for transaction fees, the digital nature of cryptocurrencies significantly decreases the cost of digital transactions. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:09 am by Norman L. Eisen
Supreme Court, Colorado Republican State Central Committee v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
A court may even decline to order costs to minimize conflict between parents (see Aubin v Aubin, 2010 BCSC 1425). [read post]