Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 9,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2013, 4:05 am
As I said in TNR: And the legal details matter. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm
Even before last Term’s Zivotofsky decision, in which the Supreme Court went out of its way to remind everyone (especially the D.C. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 1:08 pm
Similarly, documents created by independent consultants are not government documents, reasoned the DC Circuit panel, nor do they memorialize an official matter of legal significance. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Following the invalidation of three presidential “recess” appointments to the NLRB by the D.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
Johnson, 810 A.2d 871, 875 (D.C. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 8:30 am
Slated to start by the end of March, the service will cover both legislative and regulatory matters, providing news and analysis. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:41 am
Myers (Rasul I), 512 F.3d 644 (D.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 11:21 am
Nevertheless, despite the uncertain validity of recent Board decisions in general in light of the D.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:16 am
NLRB, No. 12-1115 (D.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:50 pm
Obama, No. 10-5217 (D.C. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:52 am
Shouldn't that matter? [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
– (D.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
As the D.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
Circuit or reversed by the Supreme Court, it is only a matter of time before a court (probably the D.C. federal district court) directly holds that Richard Cordray’s appointment is unlawful. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
At the behest of our good friend, D.C. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 3:44 am
In the wake of the January 25 ruling by the D.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 7:03 pm
Nationally known for her work on health care reform and related matters, Ms. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:06 pm
Finally, Martins emphasizes that the court and counsel should revisit voluntariness and presence matters frequently, in light of the D.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am
Dec. 9, 1983) (“In the absence of a statistically valid epidemiological study, even the plaintiff’s treating physician or expert witness, or any clinician for that matter, is unable to attribute a plaintiff’s injury to the swine flu vaccination. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:45 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]