Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 5981 - 6000
of 8,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
As the Ninth Circuit stated: Where a petitioner challenges the state court’s findings based entirely on the state record, ‘we must be particularly deferential to our state-court colleagues,” and defer to their factual findings unless we are “convinced that an appellate panel, applying the normal standards of appellate review, could not reasonably conclude that the finding is supported by the record. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Wyoming (Jan. 8): Validity of 1868 treaty giving Crow Tribe of Indians the right to hunt on the “unoccupied lands of the United States” Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:34 am
Gideon then sent a handwritten five-page petition to the United States Supreme Court asking for his appeal to be accepted. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:34 am
Gideon then sent a handwritten five-page petition to the United States Supreme Court asking for his appeal to be accepted. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 6:51 am
- We look at why moving away from the United States will likely not be an effective solution for dealing with debts. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:27 am
Or, as the Court wrote in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 3:00 pm
The person requesting an expunction, also known as the petitioner, will include the following information in the petition: personal identifying information, the offense charged, the dates of the arrest and alleged offense, the name of the arresting agency, and a list of all of the facilities or agencies that may have a record of the arrest. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Department of Energy, "20% Wind Energy by 2030" (July 2008), stated that such European shallow-water technology is too expensive and too difficult to site in U.S. waters. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Injunctive relief generally is not available to prohibit the making of defamatory statements as prior restraints on speech violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:19 am
" The panel accordingly granted a motion to vacate the rule (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 10:00 am
”Yesterday, the Eleventh Circuit issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
In 1966 in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:55 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has extended the period for deferring certain deadlines under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
United States, was brought by a coalition of steel importers and is available here.You may recall that AIIS tried to skip the Court of Appeals and move directly from the Court of International Trade to the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 7:35 am
.)United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Angletti utilized "nail and mail" service under the order to show cause, was required to affix the papers to the door of Morreale's residence "AND [enclose] the same in a securely sealed and duly prepaid wrapper addressed to [Morreale] at the address set forth in his . . . designating petition, and depositing the same with a depository of the United States Postal Service via Express Mail on or before the 23rd day of July, 2015. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 7:01 am
., 2022 WL 501625 (9th Circuit, 2022) Petitioner-Appellant Patrick Daniel Kenny appealed from a district court order denying his petition to have his toddler son repatriated from the United States to the Republic of Ireland for custody proceedings against Respondent-Appellee Grace-Anne Davis. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:19 am
Allen Rutberg Exhibit W Wild News: 2013 Update on Nonlethal Sterilization Exhibit X Record of Decision, May 2012 Exhibit Y Minutes of Science Team, March 2006 Exhibit Z Fertility Proposal from The Humane Society of the United… [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 11:18 pm
For United States, as amicus curiae: Donald B. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 8:40 am
In a brief in opposition, the United States said that no further review was warranted, agreeing with the Second Circuit that Kosinski was entrusted with confidential information for the purposes of the trial, and that there was an implicit understanding that the information was not to be used for Kosinski's personal benefit.Other Court news. [read post]
