Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5981 - 6000 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by familoo
As Justice McReynolds famously said in Pierce v Society of Sisters 268 US 510 (1925), at 535, “The child is not the mere creature of the State”. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am by Raffaela Wakeman
And as we saw in the Boston Marathon bombing incident, home-grown terrorists or terrorists who are sleeper cells inside the United States are a threat. . . [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:13 am by Sara Hutchins Jodka
Davis appealed, and during that appeal, the United States Supreme Court decided the employer-friendly, anti-class action case, Dukes. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am by Susan Brenner
In or about August 2010, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, in coordination with DOJ, issued a subpoena to BP for flow-rate related documents from April 20, 2010 to August 9, 2010. [read post]
By contrast, the work of a city council, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:32 pm by Mary Dwyer
United States 12-1056Issue: (1) Whether a conspiracy charge under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:16 am by Susan Brenner
The burden of establishing that this exception applies is on the State. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:12 pm
The United States Supreme Court handed down somewhat of a shocking decision this week in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:17 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324, (1977) -- “dooms the plaintiffs’ request for certification under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:20 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  On May 17, the Solicitor General, having been invited to do so by the court, filed a brief expressing the views of the United States on whether the court should grant the petition for certiorari. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:26 am by Andrew Trask
Like the female employees in the Wal-Mart litigation, the putative class in this case--all purchasers of Viking appliances across the United States--present similar problems with commonality. [read post]