Search for: "S. W. v. State" Results 6001 - 6020 of 14,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2016, 4:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In O2 Micro, we held that “[w]hen theparties present a fundamental dispute regarding thescope of a claim term, it is the court’s duty to resolve it. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Law Office of W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220 [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 7:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Indian Child Welfare Act – Placement)In re Isaiah W. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
  If Helen Weste had the capacity to live alone and care for herself, she had the capacity to make a [w]ill.Judge Ciuffani noted that "[t]he case law clearly states that the threshold for testamentary capacity is very low, one need only possess a very [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
He replied that it would be permissible to state that the person had taken a car without the permission of the owner. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 8:06 am by Bill Marler
In a memo to FDA, the committee states: “the sixty-day aging process for hard cheese is questionable as an effective measure in support of the public’s health. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The MEO position was also a position in the noncompetitive class and Hanson's appointment was subject to his successfully completing a probationary period of not less than eight weeks nor more than 52 weeks in accordance with Schoharie County's Civil Service rules.An interim probationary service report indicated that Hanson’s job performance was satisfactory and stated that his probationary period was set to expire on December 23, 2013. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:00 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Qui Tam “The Bayrock Qui Tam Litigation Partnership,” Plaintiff, v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:12 am by Docket Navigator
[W]hile Patent Owner’s argument that the United States 'directed and controlled the allegedly infringing activity' is not without relevance, it does not bear directly on the categories identified by the Supreme Court in [Taylor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am by Ron Coleman
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]