Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 6001 - 6020
of 41,724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 7:13 am
" Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:27 am
The mootness as the inmate B is clear: the state has turned over the records. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:15 am
" Pro-Football, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 3:26 pm
Leann Reust (NFP) William B. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Benefits available to State employees and employees of a political subdivision of the State ordered to military service §§242 and 243 of New York State’s Military Law Ronald Miller, Esq., in an item posted in CCH’s Blog Employment Law Daily,* reports that a “city was denied summary judgment against an employee’s claim that it refused to reemploy her as a building custodian following her return from active duty with the National Guard… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 12:15 pm
From "The Presidents of the United States in Order of Hotness. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 7:32 am
In Etienne v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm
Daniel B. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:59 am
IDT Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:23 pm
(a), (b).) [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:23 am
Next Level SportSystems, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:03 am
Joe B. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:52 am
BillingNetwork Patent, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
Ouyeinc, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. iMove, Inc., No. 17 C 8021, Slip Op. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:19 am
Sullivan & Survivor Music, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 1:26 pm
Stark in Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:24 am
Incidentally, the nomination committee of 1200 members is carefully packed with pro China sympathizers that the outcome of election, whether is it is A or B will be the choice of China and may not be of the people of Hong Kong. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Johnson was not entitled to a statement of the reason for the termination of her probationary employment, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760.Accordingly, said the court, Supreme Court properly granted the appointing authority’s motion to dismiss Johnson’s petition.* See, for example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(b) of the Rules of the State Civil Service Commission. [read post]
