Search for: "BES v. State" Results 6041 - 6060 of 68,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 265F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 4:09 pm
In the first part of its opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
There is an interesting controversy brewing at Central Connecticut State University where faculty are being offered funding to assist them in securing tenure. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am by Jill Murray, Olswang.
  However, he stated there was a “strong public interest in this statutory regime”. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
 On the principle of the matter, he stated at 111:In my judgment this reasoning [from Rohm & Haas] is persuasive, and it is supported by the subsequent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Virgin v Premium. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am by Alessandro Cerri
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]