Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 6061 - 6080
of 7,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm
As far as securities and the economy in general are concerned, once Wickard v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
United States, which was argued in November. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
Yesterday, in Golan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
Among the highlights of the Study's recommendations are these: * the "genuine use" requirement -- ie should use of an earlier Community trade mark in only one EU Member State count as genuine use of a mark that purportedly covers the entire EU (currently festering before the ECJ in ONEL/OMEL) should be left to the ECJ to decide, but the solution should not be one that takes political boundaries into consideration; * the "graphic representation" requirement… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 2:58 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
For example, between 2005 and 2009, Medical Capital Holdings, Inc. raised $2.2 billion through six rounds of deals from investors. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm
., v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:28 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:32 am
Golan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
In Rodrigues v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:00 pm
The Alert has been focusing on rapid changes to the practice of indigent defense including issues of Public Defender independence in New Jersey and New Mexico, the scope of counsel in Michigan and Florida, as well as cost issues nationally and how one state, Massachusetts, has responded. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:28 pm
In this charge, filed by the Connecticut State Employees Association/SEIU, the employer is not alleged to have wrongfully disciplined an employee for violating its social-media policy. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:33 pm
V is struck by several rounds from the Mac-10. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amen [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:40 am
Bullcoming v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:05 am
A Ray of Hope for the State However, just today, the Fifth District Court of Appeals issue State v. [read post]
