Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 6081 - 6100 of 15,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2015, 7:42 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dec. 23, 2014) Plaintiffs make various electronics and accessories, with various registered marks. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:50 pm by Neil Wilkof
In the EU, examples are ‘medicinal product’ (Art. 1 of Directive 2001/83/EC) and ‘food supplements’ (Art. 2(a) of Directive 2002/46/EC). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
 The only relief for Sony at the hands of Justice Green came with the ruling that he would strike out the allegations made by the claimants that Sony had knowingly committed secondary infringement of copyright under sections 23 and 24 of the CDPA. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
’”Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1322–23 (quoting VitronicsCorp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:18 pm
Klein points to three commonly present economic factors that create the sort of incentive divergence that warrants RPM: (1) Manufacturers often enjoy a larger per-unit profit margin than do their retailers. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:58 am by Brandon Kain
The causes of action advanced by the plaintiff were essentially twofold: (1) breach of the implied warranties of quality and fitness in ss. 18(a) and (b) of the B.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:02 pm by Alex Oliveira
If a cruise line does not follow protocol, passengers could potentially file a lawsuit for negligence. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 10:57 am by Stephen D. Tobin
In that response, USACE stated, “Any additional questions must be submitted by December 1, 2021. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The Starters In 2023, the English Court made two FRAND rate determinations:  1. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court could not find that the United States was the habitual residence of R.T.D.L. and N.A.D.L. on the date of removal, March 23, 2018. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 6:00 pm
The "NFP" designation of Indiana Court of Appeals opinions means two things: (1) the ruling is neither posted online nor published; (2) the opinion does not have precedential value (except in narrow circumstances). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 11:41 am by Filip Radzikowski
However, only recently has it experienced an exceptional surge in popularity in Asia and the Middle East[1] and recently it is getting footing in European and US markets. [read post]