Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 6101 - 6120
of 29,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Thus, if Congress was trying to create incentives for states, it would put those incentives in the place where they would look. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
" The blog of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts tells the story of Mendez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 6:13 pm
While the Supreme Court has held that the right to marry is "fundamental," Zablocki v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 7:43 pm
On January 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in two cases—Relentless v. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 6:25 am
Georgia v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 11:31 pm
That was the first issue in United States v. 1.04 Acres of Land, No. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:45 am
Shular v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 6:03 am
Arguing for state and local officials in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:00 am
In the recent decision of United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
Furthermore, in its precedential opinion, RCA v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 7:01 am
The one Justice that seemed to say that Congress could pass such a statute was Alito.Then I actually got into the courtroom and saw the oral argument in Johnson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
I was just rereading the briefs and arguments in the landmark Myers v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
Korzen, director of the Appellate Advocacy Clinic at the Wake Forest University School of Law, will make his Supreme Court debut in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 3:52 am
To strengthen legal protections for American Indian people that disrupt these government interventions, like ICWA, is to realize reproductive rights more fully in the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:43 pm
That's the Court's square holding in New York v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 3:57 pm
Congress is all too happy for the courts, or the administrative state, to make the big decisions. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 3:41 pm
That is true even though courts otherwise have broad discretion in imposing sentence under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. 3551 et seq., as modified by this Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 1:59 pm
Health Options et al v. [read post]
