Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 6121 - 6140
of 11,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 9:02 am
To mark the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 7:28 am
Dist No. 403 v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
The ruling, deciding a novel and hotly debated issue of U.S. trademark law regarding aesthetic functionality, is a victory for both sides in some respects, yet certainly leaves the door open for future debate and lawsuits about the scope of the Louboutin mark’s protection. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Janus v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 10:07 am
, v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:34 pm
For example, a narrowly written NDA may require that information must be shared in writing and be specifically marked “Confidential. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 7:21 am
” Pregnancy Discrimination Since Young v UPS was informally resolved between the parties following the U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Milhollin, 444 U.S. 555, 568 (1980) (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 2:31 pm
Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
Factory Mutual Insurance Company and FM Approvals LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
The U.S. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:37 am
In May, the U.S. [read post]
29 May 2017, 2:44 am
[1] Dastar v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:03 am
Merial, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:20 am
Greenberg Traurig LLP, et al., , 09 Civ. 8083 (GBD) (THK); U.S. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
Yesterday the Obama administration decided that it would not ask the Supreme Court to stay a decision by the U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
